◇ Could this help me?
Yes, and it is the rare tip with no downside to trying. Asking for a visual instead of an explanation is genuinely better for anything with structure, scale, or change over time, and the interactive version is better again because adjusting a value yourself teaches the relationship in a way a static chart does not. Nothing is installed, nothing is configured, and the cost of a bad result is one discarded message. General practice, with the small honest caveat that a generated visual can be confidently wrong in the same way generated text can, so anything numeric is worth spot checking against the underlying figures before it gets shown to anyone else.
For the next explanation I ask for, default to showing me rather than telling me. Here is the concept I am trying to understand, described below. Build me an interactive visual of it where I can change the inputs that matter and watch what happens to the result, rather than a static chart. Label the axes and state the assumptions on the visual itself. Then tell me which numbers in it came from me, which you derived, and which you assumed, so I know what to check before I show this to anyone.