◇ Could this help me?
Yes for the knowledge graph idea, with the product pitch set aside. The genuinely useful point is that context is not just documents: what makes business material usable to an assistant is the relationships between the pieces, which client connects to which project connects to which decision, and a pile of files leaves all of that to be guessed at every session. Making those relationships explicit and visualizable is a real improvement over dumping folders at the problem. The rest is promotion: the twentyfold figure is unsupported, the operating system being described is the creator's own product available only by commenting, and a dashboard versus a terminal is a preference rather than a capability gain. General practice for the graph, and note that consolidating years of business context into one tool is a data decision worth making deliberately.
I want to give an AI assistant the context of my work as a structured graph rather than a folder of files. Interview me about the entities that matter in what I do, such as clients, projects, decisions, documents, and recurring processes, and the relationships between them. Then propose a graph structure that captures those relationships explicitly, and tell me how to build and maintain it without it becoming a second job. Be specific about what the assistant can answer with the graph that it could not answer from the raw files. Before I move anything into a specific tool, tell me what to check about where that data would be stored and what the tool can access.